Pipeline
How this site produces its analysis
Methodology
Every piece published on The Fiduciary follows a four-stage pipeline. AI systems handle research, preliminary analysis, and drafting. A licensed attorney makes every editorial and publication decision. This is what accountable AI-assisted work looks like.
This is what the Minnesota Digital Trust & Consumer Protection Act would require of any AI-assisted professional service: transparent methodology, clear attribution of AI and human contributions, and human accountability at the point of publication.
This site practices what the Digital Trust Act would require.
Current Status
Last: 1h ago
7 items pending review
Last: Feb 21 — Heppner case analysis
3 items pending attorney review
Last: Feb 20 — Heppner analysis draft
Queue empty
Last: Now
Reviewing 2 drafts
Model Cards
Stage 1: Research
Gemini 3 FlashContinuous monitoring of federal and state legislative databases, court dockets, regulatory filings, and legal scholarship for AI-related developments.
Stage 2: Analysis
GPT-5.2Structured legal analysis: identifying holdings, reasoning, statutory interpretation, cross-referencing existing tracker entries, and assessing Digital Trust Act implications.
Stage 3: Drafting
Opus 4.6Long-form legal writing in publication voice. Produces case briefs, commentary, legislation explainers, and policy analysis with proper legal citation formatting.
Stage 4: Attorney Review
HumanFinal editorial review by a licensed attorney. Verifies legal accuracy, citation correctness, analytical soundness, and editorial voice. The human is the bottleneck by design.
Transparency
Every published piece on The Fiduciary includes a pipeline transparency footer showing exactly which AI models contributed to the research, analysis, and drafting — and who performed the final attorney review.
Stage 1 (Research) displays live status from the pipeline infrastructure when available, with graceful fallback to static data. Stages 2–4 display static status until implemented.